Switch Attack Structure (sample)

Switch Attack Structure.

There are many ways to generate attack patterns that switch from the first breakdown. This is a sample that I hope will generate discussion in your coaching group.

Shapes such as this can be used in all areas of the field with the only variations occurring from the first breakdown. An example could be a kick option from an exit play with the forwards on the blind offering a different shape. This pattern is from a full lineout but similar plays can be run from shortened versions.

Understanding the target in the lineout is a good place to start. Labelling the jumping unit ‘employed’ can bring some role clarity. Appointing players to go to the first breakdown adds to this clarity with all other forwards classified as ‘unemployed’. While there are more specific roles and methods to assign them, I find this a simple and adaptable model.

Team policies can come into place around the breakdown. Here I have gone with ball carrier plus 3 however some may have the confidence to go ball carrier plus 2.

Deception also plays a big role. In this example I have sent the 2 ‘unemployed’ and the hooker around the corner to show a possible ‘same way’ attack. By sending the 10 with this group the deception can be greater since they tend to be around the ball often.

The 2nd attack shape can be the result of opposition analysis as weaknesses may be identified or where a coach can be creative and use his teams strengths to find space.

We must always be looking to score but it would always be wise to make sure ALL players understand their roles after the 2nd attack. This is where good teams may fall into another shape to help them maintain pressure and momentum.

Based on your own team strengths and the opportunities the opposition provide, the options are almost endless.

Comments

Vision and Decision- what’s missing?

Reaction! Good decision makers are often associated with having an abundance of time. This equates to more vision. Basically greater time to see more! As coaches we really push our players to work hard off the ball. What we want are our players to be set early so they have time to see more and thus make better decisions. But then what? Hesitation can be a real killer when under pressure. ‘Fight, flight or freeze’ are our natural reactions to these moments of pressure. Let’s look at ‘act or react’. If we work hard we have a better chance that we can dictate what happens next, we ‘act’. This is the perfect world and one we tend to train the most. But following on from a previous blog about the race, we have an opposition who are also trying to set early. Should they beat us then we are often forced to ‘react’. What this looks like can have a massive impact on the game. At some stage in a training session we need to throw in the unknown. Doing this can help...

The Race to apply pressure

Every coach has their own favourite and time-tested activities they use regularly. Players are likely to be familiar with them and the coach has confidence in them to do the job. With the need to build in activities to put the players under pressure, many coaches will look outside their area of expertise to seek something new. With good planning this can work very well, however too often we see these activities introduced at a time when the players are looking to refine what they are already doing. Pressure can be applied in many ways - for example reducing time and space or bringing in some physicality. Another method (and one I would use before physicality) is creating competition within the group. Many activities can be modified to allow groups to compete in a race-type format. Catch-pass is the most obvious, but with some thought we can use a race mentality when getting into shape, setting a lineout or working the breakdown area; the options are endless. A coach could introd...

Options - Are they in your attack plan?

Options - Are they in your attack plan? Teams who want to develop their attacking game need to have multiple options in their attack plan. The complexity of your plan depends on your personnel and the level of the competition you are playing in. Many years ago the Wallabies ran a simple shape referred to as the ‘Aussie Box’ and it completely changed the way backlines attacked. ‘Aussie Box’ variations Since then many sides have gone on to develop similar shapes around their forwards. Today we see whole team attack shapes as a big part of the modern game. At the highest level these shapes are not only an orchestrated manoeuvre, they are specifically tailored to unlock the defence structures of the opposition. This is possible thanks to the advanced level of analysis used in professional rugby. Knowledge is power when it comes to designing attacking shapes. But the unpredictability of the game can also lead to unexpected chances. Opportunities ...

Ellis Rugby Skills and Drills

Search This Blog