Switch Attack Structure (sample)

Switch Attack Structure.

There are many ways to generate attack patterns that switch from the first breakdown. This is a sample that I hope will generate discussion in your coaching group.

Shapes such as this can be used in all areas of the field with the only variations occurring from the first breakdown. An example could be a kick option from an exit play with the forwards on the blind offering a different shape. This pattern is from a full lineout but similar plays can be run from shortened versions.

Understanding the target in the lineout is a good place to start. Labelling the jumping unit ‘employed’ can bring some role clarity. Appointing players to go to the first breakdown adds to this clarity with all other forwards classified as ‘unemployed’. While there are more specific roles and methods to assign them, I find this a simple and adaptable model.

Team policies can come into place around the breakdown. Here I have gone with ball carrier plus 3 however some may have the confidence to go ball carrier plus 2.

Deception also plays a big role. In this example I have sent the 2 ‘unemployed’ and the hooker around the corner to show a possible ‘same way’ attack. By sending the 10 with this group the deception can be greater since they tend to be around the ball often.

The 2nd attack shape can be the result of opposition analysis as weaknesses may be identified or where a coach can be creative and use his teams strengths to find space.

We must always be looking to score but it would always be wise to make sure ALL players understand their roles after the 2nd attack. This is where good teams may fall into another shape to help them maintain pressure and momentum.

Based on your own team strengths and the opportunities the opposition provide, the options are almost endless.

Comments

Options - Are they in your attack plan?

Options - Are they in your attack plan? Teams who want to develop their attacking game need to have multiple options in their attack plan. The complexity of your plan depends on your personnel and the level of the competition you are playing in. Many years ago the Wallabies ran a simple shape referred to as the ‘Aussie Box’ and it completely changed the way backlines attacked. ‘Aussie Box’ variations Since then many sides have gone on to develop similar shapes around their forwards. Today we see whole team attack shapes as a big part of the modern game. At the highest level these shapes are not only an orchestrated manoeuvre, they are specifically tailored to unlock the defence structures of the opposition. This is possible thanks to the advanced level of analysis used in professional rugby. Knowledge is power when it comes to designing attacking shapes. But the unpredictability of the game can also lead to unexpected chances. Opportunities ...

Bending the Line

Bending the Line Some time ago I worked with Backs Coach Andre Bell who would often speak of ‘bending the line’ with his attack. I was always intrigued by this but to be honest never had a full understanding of its use. With defence now often dominating the game, bending the line is being seen by more teams around the world and it has grown from being a simple ‘back door’ pass to one of many variations and options. Teams in the northern hemisphere are showing greater variation than us in the south who still look to carry hard and play off the back of that. Teams like Bristol and Northampton show a real willingness to test the defence at every opportunity. Teams that really rush up hard on defence cannot afford a slight disconnect in their line integrity and creative attacking sides are looking at doing just that by having ‘front door’ and ‘back door’ options but more importantly very active blindside wingers. Running lines and timing are key to success in these plays...

Space - The final frontier

Space: the final frontier The influence of rush defence in the modern game means the ability to identify space and react in time to exploit it is an essential part of the attacking game. With fifteen players in the opposition on a 100 x 70 metre field there must be space somewhere. According to a reliable source allowing 31 sqm for players and a ref leaves 6969 sqm of space and that is not including the in goal. When eight of these players are bunched in a lineout or scrum this opens up even more space. From set-piece situations the distance between the attack and the defence is greater. Why do we seldom take advantage of this? Is it fear? Are we afraid our skills are not good enough to get to space or do we just not see it? In phase play we need time to see the space as the positioning of the defence may vary and the availability of attacking players can change. In set-piece we have both time and space plus the knowledge of the defence and attack positioning. Fin...

Ellis Rugby Skills and Drills

Search This Blog